Guardians of the Galaxy vs The Hunger Games: Catching Fire
Guardians of the Galaxy has the higher audience score (7.9/10 against 7.4/10 for The Hunger Games: Catching Fire). Guardians of the Galaxy is the shorter watch at 2h 1m compared with 2h 26m. The Hunger Games: Catching Fire is the older of the two (2013 against 2014). Both are action, adventure, science fiction movies, so they suit a similar mood.
Guardians of the Galaxy
The Hunger Games: Catching Fire| Guardians of the Galaxy | The Hunger Games: Catching Fire | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 7.9/10 | ★ 7.4/10 |
| Year | 2014 | 2013 |
| Length | 2h 1m | 2h 26m |
| Genres | Action, Adventure, Science Fiction | Action, Adventure, Science Fiction |
| Country | United States of America | – |
| Director | James Gunn | Francis Lawrence |
| Main cast | Bradley Cooper, Sean Gunn, Benicio del Toro, Djimon Hounsou, Michael Rooker | Jeffrey Wright, Jena Malone, Liam Hemsworth, Donald Sutherland, Toby Jones |
Synopsis
Guardians of the Galaxy
Light years from Earth, 26 years after being abducted, Peter Quill finds himself the prime target of a manhunt after discovering an orb wanted by Ronan the Accuser.
The Hunger Games: Catching Fire
After surviving the Hunger Games, Katniss and Peeta struggle with the consequences of their victory as unrest spreads across Panem. Forced back into the spotlight, they become symbols of hope and resistance while the Capitol prepares a new and deadly challenge that will change the future of the nation forever.
Where to watch
Where to watch Guardians of the GalaxyWhere to watch The Hunger Games: Catching Fire
More like Guardians of the Galaxy · More like The Hunger Games: Catching Fire · Compare other titles