Hancock vs The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring

The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring has the higher audience score (8.4/10 against 6.4/10 for Hancock). Hancock is the shorter watch at 1h 32m compared with 2h 59m. The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring is the older of the two (2001 against 2008). Both are action, fantasy movies, so they suit a similar mood.

Hancock posterHancock2008 VS The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring posterThe Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring2001
HancockThe Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring
Audience score★ 6.4/10★ 8.4/10
Year20082001
Length1h 32m2h 59m
GenresAction, FantasyAction, Adventure, Fantasy
Country–New Zealand
DirectorPeter BergPeter Jackson
Main castEddie Marsan, Jason Bateman, Johnny Galecki, Charlize Theron, Thomas LennonLiv Tyler, Orlando Bloom, Cate Blanchett, John Rhys-Davies, Ian McKellen

Synopsis

Hancock

Hancock is a down-and-out superhero who's forced to employ a PR expert to help repair his image when the public grows weary of all the damage he's inflicted during his lifesaving heroics. The agent's idea of imprisoning the antihero to make the world miss him proves successful, but will Hancock stick to his new sense of purpose or slip back into old habits?

The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring

Young hobbit Frodo Baggins, after inheriting a mysterious ring from his uncle Bilbo, must leave his home in order to keep it from falling into the hands of its evil creator. Along the way, a fellowship is formed to protect the ringbearer and make sure that the ring arrives at its final destination: Mt. Doom, the only place where it can be destroyed.

Where to watch

Where to watch HancockWhere to watch The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring

More like Hancock · More like The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring · Compare other titles