Hancock vs The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers

The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers has the higher audience score (8.4/10 against 6.4/10 for Hancock). Hancock is the shorter watch at 1h 32m compared with 2h 59m. The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers is the older of the two (2002 against 2008). Both are action, fantasy movies, so they suit a similar mood.

Hancock posterHancock2008 VS The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers posterThe Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers2002
HancockThe Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers
Audience score★ 6.4/10★ 8.4/10
Year20082002
Length1h 32m2h 59m
GenresAction, FantasyAction, Adventure, Fantasy
Country–New Zealand
DirectorPeter BergPeter Jackson
Main castEddie Marsan, Jason Bateman, Johnny Galecki, Charlize Theron, Thomas LennonLiv Tyler, Miranda Otto, Orlando Bloom, Cate Blanchett, John Rhys-Davies

Synopsis

Hancock

Hancock is a down-and-out superhero who's forced to employ a PR expert to help repair his image when the public grows weary of all the damage he's inflicted during his lifesaving heroics. The agent's idea of imprisoning the antihero to make the world miss him proves successful, but will Hancock stick to his new sense of purpose or slip back into old habits?

The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers

Frodo Baggins and the other members of the Fellowship continue on their sacred quest to destroy the One Ring--but on separate paths. Their destinies lie at two towers--Orthanc Tower in Isengard, where the corrupt wizard Saruman awaits, and Sauron's fortress at Barad-dur, deep within the dark lands of Mordor. Frodo and Sam are trekking to Mordor to destroy the One Ring of Power while Gimli, Legolas and Aragorn search for the orc-captured Merry…

Where to watch

Where to watch HancockWhere to watch The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers

More like Hancock · More like The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers · Compare other titles