Heartbreakers vs Soft Shoes
Soft Shoes has the higher audience score (7.5/10 against 6.1/10 for Heartbreakers). Soft Shoes is the shorter watch at 46m compared with 2h 3m. Soft Shoes is the older of the two (1925 against 2001). Both are comedy, crime, romance movies, so they suit a similar mood.
Heartbreakers
Soft Shoes| Heartbreakers | Soft Shoes | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 6.1/10 | ★ 7.5/10 |
| Year | 2001 | 1925 |
| Length | 2h 3m | 46m |
| Genres | Comedy, Crime, Romance | Comedy, Crime, Romance, Western |
| Country | – | – |
| Director | David Mirkin | Lloyd Ingraham |
| Main cast | Kevin Nealon, Jennifer Love Hewitt, Ray Liotta, Jason Lee, Gene Hackman | James Quinn, John Steppling, Francis Ford, Harry Carey, Lillian Rich |
Synopsis
Heartbreakers
Max and Page are a brilliant mother/daughter con team who have their grift down to a fine science. Max targets wealthy, willing men and marries them. Page then seduces them, and Max catches her husband in the act. Then it's off to palimony city and the next easy mark.
Soft Shoes
Sheriff Pat Halahan comes into an inheritance and travels to San Francisco to collect. Faith O’Day, a cat burglar armed with pistol and flashlight breaks into his hotel room and demands that Halahan cough up his dough. Halahan sees her threat and raises her a one-dollar bet that he can return a brooch she stole earlier the same evening before its loss is discovered. Pulling off his boots to slip on his own “soft shoes,” Halahan sets off to do a…
Where to watch
Where to watch HeartbreakersWhere to watch Soft Shoes
More like Heartbreakers · More like Soft Shoes · Compare other titles