Heat vs Paid in Full
Heat has the higher audience score (7.9/10 against 6.8/10 for Paid in Full). Paid in Full is the shorter watch at 1h 38m compared with 2h 50m. Heat is the older of the two (1995 against 2002). Both are action, crime, drama movies, so they suit a similar mood.
Heat
Paid in Full| Heat | Paid in Full | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 7.9/10 | ★ 6.8/10 |
| Year | 1995 | 2002 |
| Length | 2h 50m | 1h 38m |
| Genres | Action, Crime, Drama | Action, Crime, Drama |
| Country | – | United States of America |
| Director | Michael Mann | Charles Stone III |
| Main cast | Amy Brenneman, Jon Voight, Wes Studi, Natalie Portman, Robert De Niro | Chi McBride, Regina Hall, Wood Harris, Elise Neal, Mekhi Phifer |
Synopsis
Heat
Obsessive master thief Neil McCauley leads a top-notch crew on various daring heists throughout Los Angeles while determined detective Vincent Hanna pursues him without rest. Each man recognizes and respects the ability and the dedication of the other even though they are aware their cat-and-mouse game may end in violence.
Paid in Full
Ace is an impressionable young man working for a dry cleaning business. His friend, drug dealer Mitch, goes to prison. In an unrelated incident, he finds some cocaine in a pants pocket. Soon, Ace finds himself dealing cocaine for Lulu. Via lucky breaks and solid interpersonal skills, Ace moves to the top of the Harlem drug world. Of course, unfaithful employees and/or rivals conspire to bring about Ace's fall.
Where to watch
Where to watch HeatWhere to watch Paid in Full
More like Heat · More like Paid in Full · Compare other titles