High Crimes vs In the Line of Fire
In the Line of Fire has the higher audience score (7/10 against 6.4/10 for High Crimes). High Crimes is the shorter watch at 1h 55m compared with 2h 8m. In the Line of Fire is the older of the two (1993 against 2002). Both are crime, drama, mystery movies, so they suit a similar mood.
High Crimes
In the Line of Fire| High Crimes | In the Line of Fire | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 6.4/10 | ★ 7.0/10 |
| Year | 2002 | 1993 |
| Length | 1h 55m | 2h 8m |
| Genres | Crime, Drama, Mystery, Thriller | Action, Crime, Drama, Mystery, Thriller |
| Country | – | United States of America |
| Director | Carl Franklin | Wolfgang Petersen |
| Main cast | Michael Shannon, Jim Caviezel, Amanda Peet, Emilio Rivera, Adam Scott | Gary Cole, Dylan McDermott, Gregory Alan Williams, Tobin Bell, Clint Eastwood |
Synopsis
High Crimes
A female attorney learns that her husband is really a marine officer awol for fifteen years and accused of murdering fifteen civilians in El Salvador. Believing her husband when he tells her that he's being framed as part of a U.S. Military cover-up, the attorney defends him in a military court.
In the Line of Fire
Veteran Secret Service agent Frank Horrigan is a man haunted by his failure to save President Kennedy while serving protection detail in Dallas. Thirty years later, a man calling himself "Booth" threatens the life of the current President, forcing Horrigan to come back to protection detail to confront the ghosts from his past.
Where to watch
Where to watch High CrimesWhere to watch In the Line of Fire
More like High Crimes · More like In the Line of Fire · Compare other titles