Hitman vs Man on Fire
Man on Fire has the higher audience score (7.5/10 against 6.1/10 for Hitman). Hitman is the shorter watch at 1h 29m compared with 2h 26m. Man on Fire is the older of the two (2004 against 2007). Both are action, drama, thriller movies, so they suit a similar mood.
Hitman
Man on Fire| Hitman | Man on Fire | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 6.1/10 | ★ 7.5/10 |
| Year | 2007 | 2004 |
| Length | 1h 29m | 2h 26m |
| Genres | Action, Drama, Thriller | Action, Drama, Thriller |
| Country | – | – |
| Director | Xavier Gens | Tony Scott |
| Main cast | Robert Knepper, Timothy Olyphant, Henry Ian Cusick, Ériq Ebouaney, Dougray Scott | Dakota Fanning, Christopher Walken, Denzel Washington, Radha Mitchell, Mickey Rourke |
Synopsis
Hitman
A genetically engineered assassin with deadly aim, known only as "Agent 47" eliminates strategic targets for a top-secret organization. But when he's double-crossed, the hunter becomes the prey as 47 finds himself in a life-or-death game of international intrigue.
Man on Fire
Jaded ex-CIA operative John Creasy reluctantly accepts a job as the bodyguard for a 10-year-old girl in Mexico City. They clash at first, but eventually bond, and when she's kidnapped he's consumed by fury and will stop at nothing to save her life.
Where to watch
Where to watch HitmanWhere to watch Man on Fire
More like Hitman · More like Man on Fire · Compare other titles