Holes vs Princes and Princesses
Princes and Princesses has the higher audience score (7.7/10 against 6.9/10 for Holes). Princes and Princesses is the shorter watch at 1h 10m compared with 1h 57m. Princes and Princesses is the older of the two (2000 against 2003). Both are adventure, comedy, drama movies, so they suit a similar mood.
| Holes | Princes and Princesses | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 6.9/10 | ★ 7.7/10 |
| Year | 2003 | 2000 |
| Length | 1h 57m | 1h 10m |
| Genres | Adventure, Comedy, Drama, Family | Adventure, Animation, Comedy, Drama, Family, Fantasy, Mystery, Romance |
| Country | United States of America | – |
| Director | Andrew Davis | Michel Ocelot |
| Main cast | Dulé Hill, Jon Voight, Henry Winkler, Patricia Arquette, Eartha Kitt | Yves Barsacq, Philippe Cheytion, Arlette Mirapeu, François Voisin |
Synopsis
Holes
A wrongfully convicted boy is sent to a brutal desert detention camp where he must dig holes in order to build character. What he doesn't know is that he is digging holes in order to search for a lost treasure hidden somewhere in the camp.
Princes and Princesses
In this episodic animated fantasy from France, an art teacher interprets a series of six fairy tales (each involving a prince or princess) with the help of two precocious students. Princes and Princesses was created using a special style of cutout animation, with black silhouetted characters performing the action against backlit backdrops in striking colors.
Where to watch
Where to watch HolesWhere to watch Princes and Princesses
More like Holes · More like Princes and Princesses · Compare other titles
Holes
Princes and Princesses