In a Heartbeat vs Wimbledon
In a Heartbeat has the higher audience score (8/10 against 6.2/10 for Wimbledon). In a Heartbeat is the shorter watch at 4m compared with 1h 38m. Wimbledon is the older of the two (2004 against 2017). Both are comedy, romance movies, so they suit a similar mood.
| In a Heartbeat | Wimbledon | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 8.0/10 | ★ 6.2/10 |
| Year | 2017 | 2004 |
| Length | 4m | 1h 38m |
| Genres | Animation, Comedy, Romance | Comedy, Romance |
| Country | – | – |
| Director | Beth David, Esteban Bravo | Richard Loncraine |
| Main cast | Nick Ainsworth, Kelly Donohue | Paul Bettany, Nikolaj Coster-Waldau, Kirsten Dunst, Jon Favreau, Sam Neill |
Synopsis
In a Heartbeat
A closeted boy runs the risk of being outed by his own heart after it pops out of his chest to chase down the boy of his dreams.
Wimbledon
Britain’s Peter Colt has never quite lived up to his dreams of tennis stardom. Once ranked as high as number 11 in the world, the journeyman veteran has watched his number slip to 119 as his confidence on the court slowly ebbs away. Now, on the eve of his leaving the world of professional tennis, he’s granted a wild card, allowing him to play his final Wimbledon tournament…make that his final tournament ever.
Where to watch
Where to watch In a HeartbeatWhere to watch Wimbledon
More like In a Heartbeat · More like Wimbledon · Compare other titles
In a Heartbeat
Wimbledon