In Bruges vs To Die For
In Bruges has the higher audience score (7.5/10 against 6.6/10 for To Die For). To Die For is the shorter watch at 1h 46m compared with 1h 48m. To Die For is the older of the two (1995 against 2008). Both are comedy, crime, drama movies, so they suit a similar mood.
In Bruges
To Die For| In Bruges | To Die For | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 7.5/10 | ★ 6.6/10 |
| Year | 2008 | 1995 |
| Length | 1h 48m | 1h 46m |
| Genres | Comedy, Crime, Drama | Comedy, Crime, Drama |
| Country | – | United Kingdom |
| Director | Martin McDonagh | Gus Van Sant |
| Main cast | Željko Ivanek, Thekla Reuten, Colin Farrell, Elizabeth Berrington, Theo Stevenson | Nicole Kidman, Joaquin Phoenix, Dan Hedaya, Wayne Knight, Illeana Douglas |
Synopsis
In Bruges
Ray and Ken, two hit men, are in Bruges, Belgium, waiting for their next mission. While they are there they have time to think and discuss their previous assignment. When the mission is revealed to Ken, it is not what he expected.
To Die For
Suzanne Stone wants to be a world-famous news anchor and she is willing to do anything to get what she wants. What she lacks in intelligence, she makes up for in cold determination and diabolical wiles. As she pursues her goal with relentless focus, she is forced to destroy anything and anyone that may stand in her way, regardless of the ultimate cost or means necessary.
Where to watch
Where to watch In BrugesWhere to watch To Die For
More like In Bruges · More like To Die For · Compare other titles