In Hell vs Man on Fire
Man on Fire has the higher audience score (7.5/10 against 6.5/10 for In Hell). In Hell is the shorter watch at 1h 36m compared with 2h 26m. In Hell is the older of the two (2003 against 2004). Both are action, drama, thriller movies, so they suit a similar mood.
In Hell
Man on Fire| In Hell | Man on Fire | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 6.5/10 | ★ 7.5/10 |
| Year | 2003 | 2004 |
| Length | 1h 36m | 2h 26m |
| Genres | Action, Drama, Thriller | Action, Drama, Thriller |
| Country | – | – |
| Director | Ringo Lam Ling-Tung | Tony Scott |
| Main cast | Michael Bailey Smith, Jean-Claude Van Damme, Carlos Gómez, Robert LaSardo, Billy Rieck | Dakota Fanning, Christopher Walken, Denzel Washington, Radha Mitchell, Mickey Rourke |
Synopsis
In Hell
A man must survive a prison where hardened criminals battle to the death for the warden's entertainment.
Man on Fire
Jaded ex-CIA operative John Creasy reluctantly accepts a job as the bodyguard for a 10-year-old girl in Mexico City. They clash at first, but eventually bond, and when she's kidnapped he's consumed by fury and will stop at nothing to save her life.
Where to watch
Where to watch In HellWhere to watch Man on Fire
More like In Hell · More like Man on Fire · Compare other titles