In Hell vs Undisputed III: Redemption
Undisputed III: Redemption has the higher audience score (7.5/10 against 6.5/10 for In Hell). In Hell is the older of the two (2003 against 2010). Both are action, drama, thriller movies, so they suit a similar mood.
In Hell
Undisputed III: Redemption| In Hell | Undisputed III: Redemption | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 6.5/10 | ★ 7.5/10 |
| Year | 2003 | 2010 |
| Length | 1h 36m | 1h 36m |
| Genres | Action, Drama, Thriller | Action, Crime, Drama, Thriller |
| Country | – | – |
| Director | Ringo Lam Ling-Tung | Isaac Florentine |
| Main cast | Michael Bailey Smith, Jean-Claude Van Damme, Carlos Gómez, Robert LaSardo, Billy Rieck | Mark Ivanir, Robert Costanzo, Hristo Shopov, Scott Adkins, Marko Zaror |
Synopsis
In Hell
A man must survive a prison where hardened criminals battle to the death for the warden's entertainment.
Undisputed III: Redemption
Russian inmate Boyka, now severely hobbled by the knee injury suffered at the end of Undisputed 2. No longer the feared prison fighter he was, he has declined so far that he is now good only for cleaning toilets. But when a new prison fight tournament begins - an international affair, matching the best fighters from prisons around the globe, enticing them with the promise of freedom for the winner - Boyka must reclaim his dignity and fight for…
Where to watch
Where to watch In HellWhere to watch Undisputed III: Redemption
More like In Hell · More like Undisputed III: Redemption · Compare other titles