In Order of Disappearance vs Lethal Weapon 3
In Order of Disappearance has the higher audience score (6.9/10 against 6.7/10 for Lethal Weapon 3). In Order of Disappearance is the shorter watch at 1h 55m compared with 1h 58m. Lethal Weapon 3 is the older of the two (1992 against 2014). Both are action, comedy, crime movies, so they suit a similar mood.
In Order of Disappearance
Lethal Weapon 3| In Order of Disappearance | Lethal Weapon 3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 6.9/10 | ★ 6.7/10 |
| Year | 2014 | 1992 |
| Length | 1h 55m | 1h 58m |
| Genres | Action, Comedy, Crime, Thriller | Action, Comedy, Crime, Thriller |
| Country | – | – |
| Director | Hans Petter Moland | Richard Donner |
| Main cast | Stellan Skarsgård, Goran Navojec, Stig Henrik Hoff, Pål Sverre Hagen, Bruno Ganz | Mel Gibson, Rene Russo, Stuart Wilson, Joe Pesci, Danny Glover |
Synopsis
In Order of Disappearance
Upstanding community leader Nils has just won an award for "Citizen of the Year" when he learns the news that his son has died of a heroin overdose. Suspecting foul play, Nils begins to investigate, and soon finds himself at the center of an escalating underworld gang war between Serbian drug dealers and a sociopathic criminal mastermind known only as “The Count.”
Lethal Weapon 3
Riggs and Murtaugh pursue a former officer who uses his knowledge of police procedure and policies to steal and sell confiscated guns and ammunition to local street gangs.
Where to watch
Where to watch In Order of DisappearanceWhere to watch Lethal Weapon 3
More like In Order of Disappearance · More like Lethal Weapon 3 · Compare other titles