In the Blood vs Undisputed III: Redemption
Undisputed III: Redemption has the higher audience score (7.5/10 against 5.8/10 for In the Blood). Undisputed III: Redemption is the shorter watch at 1h 36m compared with 1h 48m. Undisputed III: Redemption is the older of the two (2010 against 2014). Both are action, crime, thriller movies, so they suit a similar mood.
In the Blood
Undisputed III: Redemption| In the Blood | Undisputed III: Redemption | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 5.8/10 | ★ 7.5/10 |
| Year | 2014 | 2010 |
| Length | 1h 48m | 1h 36m |
| Genres | Action, Crime, Thriller | Action, Crime, Drama, Thriller |
| Country | – | United States of America |
| Director | John Stockwell | Isaac Florentine |
| Main cast | Amaury Nolasco, Ismael Cruz Cordova, Eloise Mumford, Pablo Cunqueiro, Danny Trejo | Mark Ivanir, Robert Costanzo, Hristo Shopov, Scott Adkins, Marko Zaror |
Synopsis
In the Blood
When her husband goes missing during their Caribbean vacation, a woman sets off on her own to take down the men she thinks are responsible.
Undisputed III: Redemption
Russian inmate Boyka, now severely hobbled by the knee injury suffered at the end of Undisputed 2. No longer the feared prison fighter he was, he has declined so far that he is now good only for cleaning toilets. But when a new prison fight tournament begins - an international affair, matching the best fighters from prisons around the globe, enticing them with the promise of freedom for the winner - Boyka must reclaim his dignity and fight for…
Where to watch
Where to watch In the BloodWhere to watch Undisputed III: Redemption
More like In the Blood · More like Undisputed III: Redemption · Compare other titles