In the Heart of the Sea vs Lions for Lambs
In the Heart of the Sea has the higher audience score (6.8/10 against 6/10 for Lions for Lambs). Lions for Lambs is the shorter watch at 1h 32m compared with 2h 2m. Lions for Lambs is the older of the two (2007 against 2015). Both are action, adventure, drama movies, so they suit a similar mood.
In the Heart of the Sea
Lions for Lambs| In the Heart of the Sea | Lions for Lambs | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 6.8/10 | ★ 6.0/10 |
| Year | 2015 | 2007 |
| Length | 2h 2m | 1h 32m |
| Genres | Action, Adventure, Drama, History, Thriller | Action, Adventure, Drama, History |
| Country | – | – |
| Director | Ron Howard | Robert Redford |
| Main cast | Chris Hemsworth, Ben Whishaw, Cillian Murphy, Paul Anderson, Frank Dillane | Kevin Dunn, Tom Cruise, Derek Luke, Michael Peña, Andrew Garfield |
Synopsis
In the Heart of the Sea
In the winter of 1820, the New England whaling ship Essex is assaulted by something no one could believe—a whale of mammoth size and will, and an almost human sense of vengeance.
Lions for Lambs
Three stories told simultaneously in ninety minutes of real time: a Republican Senator who's a presidential hopeful gives an hour-long interview to a skeptical television reporter, detailing a strategy for victory in Afghanistan; two special forces ambushed on an Afghani ridge await rescue as Taliban forces close in; a poli-sci professor at a California college invites a student to re-engage.
Where to watch
Where to watch In the Heart of the SeaWhere to watch Lions for Lambs
More like In the Heart of the Sea · More like Lions for Lambs · Compare other titles