In the Line of Fire vs Primal Fear
Primal Fear has the higher audience score (7.7/10 against 7/10 for In the Line of Fire). In the Line of Fire is the shorter watch at 2h 8m compared with 2h 9m. In the Line of Fire is the older of the two (1993 against 1996). Both are crime, drama, mystery movies, so they suit a similar mood.
In the Line of Fire
Primal Fear| In the Line of Fire | Primal Fear | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 7.0/10 | ★ 7.7/10 |
| Year | 1993 | 1996 |
| Length | 2h 8m | 2h 9m |
| Genres | Action, Crime, Drama, Mystery, Thriller | Crime, Drama, Mystery, Thriller |
| Country | United States of America | United States of America |
| Director | Wolfgang Petersen | Gregory Hoblit |
| Main cast | Gary Cole, Dylan McDermott, Gregory Alan Williams, Tobin Bell, Clint Eastwood | Jon Seda, Maura Tierney, Richard Gere, Alfre Woodard, Laura Linney |
Synopsis
In the Line of Fire
Veteran Secret Service agent Frank Horrigan is a man haunted by his failure to save President Kennedy while serving protection detail in Dallas. Thirty years later, a man calling himself "Booth" threatens the life of the current President, forcing Horrigan to come back to protection detail to confront the ghosts from his past.
Primal Fear
An arrogant, high-powered attorney takes on the case of a poor altar boy found running away from the scene of the grisly murder of the bishop who has taken him in. The case gets a lot more complex when the accused reveals that there may or may not have been a third person in the room.
Where to watch
Where to watch In the Line of FireWhere to watch Primal Fear
More like In the Line of Fire · More like Primal Fear · Compare other titles