In the Line of Fire vs Slaves
In the Line of Fire has the higher audience score (7/10 against 5.2/10 for Slaves). Slaves is the shorter watch at 1h 17m compared with 2h 8m. Slaves is the older of the two (1977 against 1993). Both are action, mystery, thriller movies, so they suit a similar mood.
In the Line of Fire
Slaves| In the Line of Fire | Slaves | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 7.0/10 | ★ 5.2/10 |
| Year | 1993 | 1977 |
| Length | 2h 8m | 1h 17m |
| Genres | Action, Crime, Drama, Mystery, Thriller | Action, Mystery, Thriller |
| Country | United States of America | – |
| Director | Wolfgang Petersen | Jesús Franco |
| Main cast | Gary Cole, Dylan McDermott, Gregory Alan Williams, Tobin Bell, Clint Eastwood | Lina Romay, Eric Falk, Roman Huber, Joachim Kemmer, Jesús Franco |
Synopsis
In the Line of Fire
Veteran Secret Service agent Frank Horrigan is a man haunted by his failure to save President Kennedy while serving protection detail in Dallas. Thirty years later, a man calling himself "Booth" threatens the life of the current President, forcing Horrigan to come back to protection detail to confront the ghosts from his past.
Slaves
A brothel owner is questioned in the disappearance of the daughter of a wealthy man after she is still not returned, or told of her possible whereabouts, after the $5,000,000 ransom was paid.
Where to watch
Where to watch In the Line of FireWhere to watch Slaves
More like In the Line of Fire · More like Slaves · Compare other titles