In the Line of Fire vs Stone
In the Line of Fire has the higher audience score (7/10 against 5.3/10 for Stone). Stone is the shorter watch at 1h 45m compared with 2h 8m. In the Line of Fire is the older of the two (1993 against 2010). Both are action, drama, mystery movies, so they suit a similar mood.
In the Line of Fire
Stone| In the Line of Fire | Stone | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 7.0/10 | ★ 5.3/10 |
| Year | 1993 | 2010 |
| Length | 2h 8m | 1h 45m |
| Genres | Action, Crime, Drama, Mystery, Thriller | Action, Drama, Mystery, Thriller |
| Country | United States of America | – |
| Director | Wolfgang Petersen | John Curran |
| Main cast | Gary Cole, Dylan McDermott, Gregory Alan Williams, Tobin Bell, Clint Eastwood | Enver Gjokaj, Frances Conroy, Robert De Niro, Milla Jovovich, Edward Norton |
Synopsis
In the Line of Fire
Veteran Secret Service agent Frank Horrigan is a man haunted by his failure to save President Kennedy while serving protection detail in Dallas. Thirty years later, a man calling himself "Booth" threatens the life of the current President, forcing Horrigan to come back to protection detail to confront the ghosts from his past.
Stone
Parole officer Jack Mabry has only a few weeks left before retirement and wishes to finish out the cases he's been assigned. One such case is that of Gerald 'Stone' Creeson, a convicted arsonist who is up for parole. Jack is initially reluctant to indulge Stone in the coarse banter he wishes to pursue and feels little sympathy for the prisoner's pleads for an early release. Seeing little hope in convincing Jack himself, Stone arranges for his…
Where to watch
Where to watch In the Line of FireWhere to watch Stone
More like In the Line of Fire · More like Stone · Compare other titles