In the Line of Fire vs Striking Distance
In the Line of Fire has the higher audience score (7/10 against 5.8/10 for Striking Distance). Striking Distance is the shorter watch at 1h 42m compared with 2h 8m. Both are action, crime, mystery movies, so they suit a similar mood.
In the Line of Fire
Striking Distance| In the Line of Fire | Striking Distance | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 7.0/10 | ★ 5.8/10 |
| Year | 1993 | 1993 |
| Length | 2h 8m | 1h 42m |
| Genres | Action, Crime, Drama, Mystery, Thriller | Action, Crime, Mystery, Thriller |
| Country | United States of America | – |
| Director | Wolfgang Petersen | Rowdy Herrington |
| Main cast | Gary Cole, Dylan McDermott, Gregory Alan Williams, Tobin Bell, Clint Eastwood | Andre Braugher, Timothy Busfield, Sarah Jessica Parker, Dennis Farina, Bruce Willis |
Synopsis
In the Line of Fire
Veteran Secret Service agent Frank Horrigan is a man haunted by his failure to save President Kennedy while serving protection detail in Dallas. Thirty years later, a man calling himself "Booth" threatens the life of the current President, forcing Horrigan to come back to protection detail to confront the ghosts from his past.
Striking Distance
Coming from a police family, Tom Hardy ends up fighting his uncle after the murder of his father. Tom believes the killer is another cop, and goes on the record with his allegations. Demoted to water-way duty Tom, along with new partner Jo Christman, navigate the three rivers looking for clues and discovering bodies. This time the victims are women Tom knows, he must find the killer to prove his innocence.
Where to watch
Where to watch In the Line of FireWhere to watch Striking Distance
More like In the Line of Fire · More like Striking Distance · Compare other titles