In the Line of Fire vs Term Life
In the Line of Fire has the higher audience score (7/10 against 6/10 for Term Life). Term Life is the shorter watch at 1h 33m compared with 2h 8m. In the Line of Fire is the older of the two (1993 against 2016). Both are action, drama, mystery movies, so they suit a similar mood.
| In the Line of Fire | Term Life | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 7.0/10 | ★ 6.0/10 |
| Year | 1993 | 2016 |
| Length | 2h 8m | 1h 33m |
| Genres | Action, Crime, Drama, Mystery, Thriller | Action, Drama, Mystery, Thriller |
| Country | United States of America | – |
| Director | Wolfgang Petersen | Peter Billingsley |
| Main cast | Gary Cole, Dylan McDermott, Gregory Alan Williams, Tobin Bell, Clint Eastwood | Jonathan Banks, Shea Whigham, Terrence Howard, Taraji P. Henson, Hailee Steinfeld |
Synopsis
In the Line of Fire
Veteran Secret Service agent Frank Horrigan is a man haunted by his failure to save President Kennedy while serving protection detail in Dallas. Thirty years later, a man calling himself "Booth" threatens the life of the current President, forcing Horrigan to come back to protection detail to confront the ghosts from his past.
Term Life
If Nick Barrow can stay alive for 21 days, he'll die happy. Everyone Nick knows wants him dead; Mob bosses, contract killers, and dirty cops. Performing the last act of a desperate man, Nick takes out a million dollar insurance policy on himself, payable to his estranged daughter. The problem? The policy doesn't take effect for 21 days. Nick knows they'll be lucky to be alive for twenty-one hours.
Where to watch
Where to watch In the Line of FireWhere to watch Term Life
More like In the Line of Fire · More like Term Life · Compare other titles
In the Line of Fire
Term Life