In the Line of Fire vs The Bourne Ultimatum
The Bourne Ultimatum has the higher audience score (7.4/10 against 7/10 for In the Line of Fire). The Bourne Ultimatum is the shorter watch at 1h 55m compared with 2h 8m. In the Line of Fire is the older of the two (1993 against 2007). Both are action, drama, mystery movies, so they suit a similar mood.
In the Line of Fire
The Bourne Ultimatum| In the Line of Fire | The Bourne Ultimatum | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 7.0/10 | ★ 7.4/10 |
| Year | 1993 | 2007 |
| Length | 2h 8m | 1h 55m |
| Genres | Action, Crime, Drama, Mystery, Thriller | Action, Drama, Mystery, Thriller |
| Country | United States of America | United States of America |
| Director | Wolfgang Petersen | Paul Greengrass |
| Main cast | Gary Cole, Dylan McDermott, Gregory Alan Williams, Tobin Bell, Clint Eastwood | Joan Allen, Paddy Considine, Albert Finney, Matt Damon, David Strathairn |
Synopsis
In the Line of Fire
Veteran Secret Service agent Frank Horrigan is a man haunted by his failure to save President Kennedy while serving protection detail in Dallas. Thirty years later, a man calling himself "Booth" threatens the life of the current President, forcing Horrigan to come back to protection detail to confront the ghosts from his past.
The Bourne Ultimatum
Bourne is brought out of hiding once again by reporter Simon Ross who is trying to unveil Operation Blackbriar, an upgrade to Project Treadstone, in a series of newspaper columns. Information from the reporter stirs a new set of memories, and Bourne must finally uncover his dark past while dodging The Company's best efforts to eradicate him.
Where to watch
Where to watch In the Line of FireWhere to watch The Bourne Ultimatum
More like In the Line of Fire · More like The Bourne Ultimatum · Compare other titles