In the Line of Fire vs The Girl Who Played with Fire
In the Line of Fire and The Girl Who Played with Fire are tied on audience score (7/10). In the Line of Fire is the shorter watch at 2h 8m compared with 2h 9m. In the Line of Fire is the older of the two (1993 against 2009). Both are action, crime, drama movies, so they suit a similar mood.
In the Line of Fire
The Girl Who Played with Fire| In the Line of Fire | The Girl Who Played with Fire | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 7.0/10 | ★ 7.0/10 |
| Year | 1993 | 2009 |
| Length | 2h 8m | 2h 9m |
| Genres | Action, Crime, Drama, Mystery, Thriller | Action, Crime, Drama, Mystery, Thriller |
| Country | United States of America | Denmark |
| Director | Wolfgang Petersen | Daniel Alfredson |
| Main cast | Gary Cole, Dylan McDermott, Gregory Alan Williams, Tobin Bell, Clint Eastwood | Annika Hallin, Reuben Sallmander, Michael Nyqvist, Lena Endre, Noomi Rapace |
Synopsis
In the Line of Fire
Veteran Secret Service agent Frank Horrigan is a man haunted by his failure to save President Kennedy while serving protection detail in Dallas. Thirty years later, a man calling himself "Booth" threatens the life of the current President, forcing Horrigan to come back to protection detail to confront the ghosts from his past.
The Girl Who Played with Fire
Mikael Blomkvist, publisher of Millennium magazine, has made his living exposing the crooked and corrupt practices of establishment Swedish figures. So when a young journalist approaches him with a meticulously researched thesis about sex trafficking in Sweden and those in high office who abuse underage girls, Blomkvist immediately throws himself into the investigation.
Where to watch
Where to watch In the Line of FireWhere to watch The Girl Who Played with Fire
More like In the Line of Fire · More like The Girl Who Played with Fire · Compare other titles