In the Line of Fire vs Trance
In the Line of Fire has the higher audience score (7/10 against 6.6/10 for Trance). Trance is the shorter watch at 1h 41m compared with 2h 8m. In the Line of Fire is the older of the two (1993 against 2013). Both are crime, drama, mystery movies, so they suit a similar mood.
In the Line of Fire
Trance| In the Line of Fire | Trance | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 7.0/10 | ★ 6.6/10 |
| Year | 1993 | 2013 |
| Length | 2h 8m | 1h 41m |
| Genres | Action, Crime, Drama, Mystery, Thriller | Crime, Drama, Mystery, Thriller |
| Country | United States of America | United Kingdom |
| Director | Wolfgang Petersen | Danny Boyle |
| Main cast | Gary Cole, Dylan McDermott, Gregory Alan Williams, Tobin Bell, Clint Eastwood | Rosario Dawson, Tuppence Middleton, Vincent Cassel, Spencer Wilding, Danny Sapani |
Synopsis
In the Line of Fire
Veteran Secret Service agent Frank Horrigan is a man haunted by his failure to save President Kennedy while serving protection detail in Dallas. Thirty years later, a man calling himself "Booth" threatens the life of the current President, forcing Horrigan to come back to protection detail to confront the ghosts from his past.
Trance
A violent gang enlists the help of a hypnotherapist in an attempt to locate a painting which somehow vanished in the middle of a heist.
Where to watch
Where to watch In the Line of FireWhere to watch Trance
More like In the Line of Fire · More like Trance · Compare other titles