In the Mouth of Madness vs Twin Peaks: Fire Walk with Me
Twin Peaks: Fire Walk with Me has the higher audience score (7.4/10 against 7.2/10 for In the Mouth of Madness). In the Mouth of Madness is the shorter watch at 1h 35m compared with 2h 15m. Twin Peaks: Fire Walk with Me is the older of the two (1992 against 1995). Both are horror, mystery movies, so they suit a similar mood.
In the Mouth of Madness
Twin Peaks: Fire Walk with Me| In the Mouth of Madness | Twin Peaks: Fire Walk with Me | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 7.2/10 | ★ 7.4/10 |
| Year | 1995 | 1992 |
| Length | 1h 35m | 2h 15m |
| Genres | Horror, Mystery | Drama, Horror, Mystery |
| Country | – | – |
| Director | John Carpenter | David Lynch |
| Main cast | David Warner, Kevin Rushton, Sam Neill, John Glover, Jürgen Prochnow | Pamela Gidley, Mädchen Amick, Miguel Ferrer, Heather Graham, Ray Wise |
Synopsis
In the Mouth of Madness
An insurance investigator begins discovering the impact a horror writer's books has on his fans is more than inspirational.
Twin Peaks: Fire Walk with Me
In the questionable town of Deer Meadow, Washington, FBI Agent Desmond inexplicably disappears while hunting for the man who murdered a teen girl. The killer is never apprehended, and, after experiencing dark visions and supernatural encounters, Agent Dale Cooper chillingly predicts that the culprit will claim another life. Meanwhile, in the more cozy town of Twin Peaks, hedonistic beauty Laura Palmer hangs with lowlifes and seems destined for…
Where to watch
Where to watch In the Mouth of MadnessWhere to watch Twin Peaks: Fire Walk with Me
More like In the Mouth of Madness · More like Twin Peaks: Fire Walk with Me · Compare other titles