Inception vs The Hunger Games: Catching Fire
Inception has the higher audience score (8.4/10 against 7.4/10 for The Hunger Games: Catching Fire). The Hunger Games: Catching Fire is the shorter watch at 2h 26m compared with 2h 28m. Inception is the older of the two (2010 against 2013). Both are action, adventure, science fiction movies, so they suit a similar mood.
Inception
The Hunger Games: Catching Fire| Inception | The Hunger Games: Catching Fire | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 8.4/10 | ★ 7.4/10 |
| Year | 2010 | 2013 |
| Length | 2h 28m | 2h 26m |
| Genres | Action, Adventure, Science Fiction | Action, Adventure, Science Fiction |
| Country | – | – |
| Director | Christopher Nolan | Francis Lawrence |
| Main cast | Tom Hardy, Cillian Murphy, Elliot Page, Michael Caine, Leonardo DiCaprio | Jeffrey Wright, Jena Malone, Liam Hemsworth, Donald Sutherland, Toby Jones |
Synopsis
Inception
Cobb, a skilled thief who commits corporate espionage by infiltrating the subconscious of his targets is offered a chance to regain his old life as payment for a task considered to be impossible: "inception", the implantation of another person's idea into a target's subconscious.
The Hunger Games: Catching Fire
After surviving the Hunger Games, Katniss and Peeta struggle with the consequences of their victory as unrest spreads across Panem. Forced back into the spotlight, they become symbols of hope and resistance while the Capitol prepares a new and deadly challenge that will change the future of the nation forever.
Where to watch
Where to watch InceptionWhere to watch The Hunger Games: Catching Fire
More like Inception · More like The Hunger Games: Catching Fire · Compare other titles