Intrepid vs Man on Fire
Man on Fire has the higher audience score (7.5/10 against 4.1/10 for Intrepid). Intrepid is the shorter watch at 1h 30m compared with 2h 26m. Intrepid is the older of the two (2000 against 2004). Both are action, drama, thriller movies, so they suit a similar mood.
| Intrepid | Man on Fire | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 4.1/10 | ★ 7.5/10 |
| Year | 2000 | 2004 |
| Length | 1h 30m | 2h 26m |
| Genres | Action, Drama, Thriller | Action, Drama, Thriller |
| Country | – | – |
| Director | John Putch | Tony Scott |
| Main cast | James Coburn, Costas Mandylor, Finola Hughes, Alex Hyde-White, Larry Poindexter | Dakota Fanning, Christopher Walken, Denzel Washington, Radha Mitchell, Mickey Rourke |
Synopsis
Intrepid
Hotshot Navy special ops guys get assigned to take a cruise to keep an eye on a VIP's daughter. Once the voyage is under way, somehow a nuke A) gets lost in the vicinity, and goes off. The resulting tidal wave capsizes the cruise ship, and its up to our heros to save the day
Man on Fire
Jaded ex-CIA operative John Creasy reluctantly accepts a job as the bodyguard for a 10-year-old girl in Mexico City. They clash at first, but eventually bond, and when she's kidnapped he's consumed by fury and will stop at nothing to save her life.
Where to watch
Where to watch IntrepidWhere to watch Man on Fire
More like Intrepid · More like Man on Fire · Compare other titles
Intrepid
Man on Fire