Iron Man vs Thor: Ragnarok
Iron Man has the higher audience score (7.7/10 against 7.6/10 for Thor: Ragnarok). Iron Man is the shorter watch at 2h 6m compared with 2h 11m. Iron Man is the older of the two (2008 against 2017). Both are action, adventure, science fiction movies, so they suit a similar mood.
Iron Man
Thor: Ragnarok| Iron Man | Thor: Ragnarok | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 7.7/10 | ★ 7.6/10 |
| Year | 2008 | 2017 |
| Length | 2h 6m | 2h 11m |
| Genres | Action, Adventure, Science Fiction | Action, Adventure, Science Fiction |
| Country | United States of America | United States of America |
| Director | Jon Favreau | Taika Waititi |
| Main cast | Paul Bettany, Clark Gregg, Jeff Bridges, Terrence Howard, Tim Guinee | Ray Stevenson, Chris Hemsworth, Benedict Cumberbatch, Clancy Brown, Tom Hiddleston |
Synopsis
Iron Man
After being held captive in an Afghan cave, billionaire engineer Tony Stark creates a unique weaponized suit of armor to fight evil.
Thor: Ragnarok
Thor is imprisoned on the other side of the universe and finds himself in a race against time to get back to Asgard to stop Ragnarok, the destruction of his home-world and the end of Asgardian civilization, at the hands of a powerful new threat, the ruthless Hela.
Where to watch
Where to watch Iron ManWhere to watch Thor: Ragnarok
More like Iron Man · More like Thor: Ragnarok · Compare other titles