Jarhead 2: Field of Fire vs Lone Survivor
Lone Survivor has the higher audience score (7.4/10 against 6.2/10 for Jarhead 2: Field of Fire). Jarhead 2: Field of Fire is the shorter watch at 1h 43m compared with 2h 1m. Lone Survivor is the older of the two (2013 against 2014). Both are action, war movies, so they suit a similar mood.
Jarhead 2: Field of Fire
Lone Survivor| Jarhead 2: Field of Fire | Lone Survivor | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 6.2/10 | ★ 7.4/10 |
| Year | 2014 | 2013 |
| Length | 1h 43m | 2h 1m |
| Genres | Action, War | Action, Drama, War |
| Country | – | – |
| Director | Don Michael Paul | Peter Berg |
| Main cast | Cole Hauser, Danielle Savre, Esai Morales, Stephen Lang, Jason Wong | Alexander Ludwig, Jerry Ferrara, Taylor Kitsch, Ali Suliman, Eric Bana |
Synopsis
Jarhead 2: Field of Fire
Battle-scarred and disillusioned by the war, Corporal Chris Merrimette is put in charge of a unit whose next mission is to resupply a remote outpost on the edge of Taliban-controlled territory. While driving through the hostile Helmand province, a Navy SEAL flags down their convoy and enlists the unit on an operation of international importance: they must help an Afghan woman famous for her defiance of the Taliban escape the country. Without…
Lone Survivor
Four Navy SEALs on a covert mission to neutralize a high-level Taliban operative must make an impossible moral decision in the mountains of Afghanistan that leads them into an enemy ambush. As they confront unthinkable odds, the SEALs must find reserves of strength and resilience to fight to the finish.
Where to watch
Where to watch Jarhead 2: Field of FireWhere to watch Lone Survivor
More like Jarhead 2: Field of Fire · More like Lone Survivor · Compare other titles