Joint Security Area vs Man on Fire
Joint Security Area has the higher audience score (7.8/10 against 7.5/10 for Man on Fire). Joint Security Area is the shorter watch at 1h 48m compared with 2h 26m. Joint Security Area is the older of the two (2000 against 2004). Both are action, drama, thriller movies, so they suit a similar mood.
| Joint Security Area | Man on Fire | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 7.8/10 | ★ 7.5/10 |
| Year | 2000 | 2004 |
| Length | 1h 48m | 2h 26m |
| Genres | Action, Drama, Mystery, Thriller, War | Action, Drama, Thriller |
| Country | – | – |
| Director | Park Chan-wook | Tony Scott |
| Main cast | Lee Byung-hun, Shin Ha-kyun, Song Kang-ho, Ki Joo-bong, Lee Dae-yeon | Dakota Fanning, Christopher Walken, Denzel Washington, Radha Mitchell, Mickey Rourke |
Synopsis
Joint Security Area
Two North Korean soldiers are killed in the border area between North and South Korea, prompting an investigation by a neutral body. The sergeant is the shooter, but the lead investigator, a Swiss-Korean woman, receives differing accounts from the two sides.
Man on Fire
Jaded ex-CIA operative John Creasy reluctantly accepts a job as the bodyguard for a 10-year-old girl in Mexico City. They clash at first, but eventually bond, and when she's kidnapped he's consumed by fury and will stop at nothing to save her life.
Where to watch
Where to watch Joint Security AreaWhere to watch Man on Fire
More like Joint Security Area · More like Man on Fire · Compare other titles
Joint Security Area
Man on Fire