Judicial Indiscretion vs The Silence of the Lambs
The Silence of the Lambs has the higher audience score (8.3/10 against 4.8/10 for Judicial Indiscretion). Judicial Indiscretion is the shorter watch at 1h 29m compared with 1h 59m. The Silence of the Lambs is the older of the two (1991 against 2007). Both are drama, thriller movies, so they suit a similar mood.
Judicial Indiscretion
The Silence of the Lambs| Judicial Indiscretion | The Silence of the Lambs | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 4.8/10 | ★ 8.3/10 |
| Year | 2007 | 1991 |
| Length | 1h 29m | 1h 59m |
| Genres | Drama, Thriller | Crime, Drama, Thriller |
| Country | – | – |
| Director | George Mendeluk | Jonathan Demme |
| Main cast | Matthew Harrison, Anne Archer, Kurt Evans, Brian Drummond, William B. Davis | Anthony Hopkins, Jodie Foster, Brooke Smith, Tracey Walter, Anthony Heald |
Synopsis
Judicial Indiscretion
A federal judge’s life is disrupted by sexual assault, blackmail and murder after she’s put on the shortlist to fill a vacant Supreme Court seat.
The Silence of the Lambs
Clarice Starling is a top student at the FBI's training academy. Jack Crawford wants Clarice to interview Dr. Hannibal Lecter, a brilliant psychiatrist who is also a violent psychopath, serving life behind bars for various acts of murder and cannibalism. Crawford believes that Lecter may have insight into a case and that Starling, as an attractive young woman, may be just the bait to draw him out.
Where to watch
Where to watch Judicial IndiscretionWhere to watch The Silence of the Lambs
More like Judicial Indiscretion · More like The Silence of the Lambs · Compare other titles