Jungle Raiders vs The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring
The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring has the higher audience score (8.4/10 against 5.5/10 for Jungle Raiders). The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring is the shorter watch at 2h 59m compared with 4h 44m. Jungle Raiders is the older of the two (1945 against 2001). Both are action, adventure movies, so they suit a similar mood.
Jungle Raiders
The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring| Jungle Raiders | The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 5.5/10 | ★ 8.4/10 |
| Year | 1945 | 2001 |
| Length | 4h 44m | 2h 59m |
| Genres | Action, Adventure | Action, Adventure, Fantasy |
| Country | United States of America | New Zealand |
| Director | Lesley Selander | Peter Jackson |
| Main cast | George Turner, Jack Gordon, Kane Richmond, Eddie Quillan, Veda Ann Borg | Liv Tyler, Orlando Bloom, Cate Blanchett, John Rhys-Davies, Ian McKellen |
Synopsis
Jungle Raiders
Greedy traders have kidnapped a researcher, hoping he will reveal the location of a treasure in a hidden village. Family and friends of the researcher come looking for him. Adventure ensues.
The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring
Young hobbit Frodo Baggins, after inheriting a mysterious ring from his uncle Bilbo, must leave his home in order to keep it from falling into the hands of its evil creator. Along the way, a fellowship is formed to protect the ringbearer and make sure that the ring arrives at its final destination: Mt. Doom, the only place where it can be destroyed.
Where to watch
Where to watch Jungle RaidersWhere to watch The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring
More like Jungle Raiders · More like The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring · Compare other titles