Juror #2 vs The Silence of the Lambs
The Silence of the Lambs has the higher audience score (8.3/10 against 6.9/10 for Juror #2). Juror #2 is the shorter watch at 1h 54m compared with 1h 59m. The Silence of the Lambs is the older of the two (1991 against 2024). Both are drama, thriller movies, so they suit a similar mood.
Juror #2
The Silence of the Lambs| Juror #2 | The Silence of the Lambs | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 6.9/10 | ★ 8.3/10 |
| Year | 2024 | 1991 |
| Length | 1h 54m | 1h 59m |
| Genres | Drama, Thriller | Crime, Drama, Thriller |
| Country | – | – |
| Director | Clint Eastwood | Jonathan Demme |
| Main cast | Kiefer Sutherland, Gabriel Basso, Adrienne C. Moore, Chris Messina, Leslie Bibb | Anthony Hopkins, Jodie Foster, Brooke Smith, Tracey Walter, Anthony Heald |
Synopsis
Juror #2
While serving as a juror in a high profile murder trial, family man Justin Kemp finds himself struggling with a serious moral dilemma…one he could use to sway the jury verdict and potentially convict—or free—the accused killer.
The Silence of the Lambs
Clarice Starling is a top student at the FBI's training academy. Jack Crawford wants Clarice to interview Dr. Hannibal Lecter, a brilliant psychiatrist who is also a violent psychopath, serving life behind bars for various acts of murder and cannibalism. Crawford believes that Lecter may have insight into a case and that Starling, as an attractive young woman, may be just the bait to draw him out.
Where to watch
Where to watch Juror #2Where to watch The Silence of the Lambs
More like Juror #2 · More like The Silence of the Lambs · Compare other titles