Kal Ho Naa Ho vs La La Land
La La Land has the higher audience score (7.9/10 against 7.4/10 for Kal Ho Naa Ho). La La Land is the shorter watch at 2h 9m compared with 3h 7m. Kal Ho Naa Ho is the older of the two (2003 against 2016). Both are comedy, drama, romance movies, so they suit a similar mood.
Kal Ho Naa Ho
La La Land| Kal Ho Naa Ho | La La Land | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 7.4/10 | ★ 7.9/10 |
| Year | 2003 | 2016 |
| Length | 3h 7m | 2h 9m |
| Genres | Comedy, Drama, Romance | Comedy, Drama, Music, Romance |
| Country | India | United States of America |
| Director | Nikkhil Advani | Damien Chazelle |
| Main cast | Saif Ali Khan, Shah Rukh Khan, Satish Shah, Sonali Bendre, Preity Zinta | Rosemarie DeWitt, Ryan Gosling, J.K. Simmons, Emma Stone, Sonoya Mizuno |
Synopsis
Kal Ho Naa Ho
An uptight MBA student falls for the charismatic new neighbor who charms her troubled family – but he has a secret that forces him to push her away.
La La Land
Mia, an aspiring actress, serves lattes to movie stars in between auditions and Sebastian, a jazz musician, scrapes by playing cocktail party gigs in dingy bars, but as success mounts they are faced with decisions that begin to fray the fragile fabric of their love affair, and the dreams they worked so hard to maintain in each other threaten to rip them apart.
Where to watch
Where to watch Kal Ho Naa HoWhere to watch La La Land
More like Kal Ho Naa Ho · More like La La Land · Compare other titles