Kal Ho Naa Ho vs Sing Street
Sing Street has the higher audience score (7.9/10 against 7.4/10 for Kal Ho Naa Ho). Sing Street is the shorter watch at 1h 45m compared with 3h 7m. Kal Ho Naa Ho is the older of the two (2003 against 2016). Both are comedy, drama, romance movies, so they suit a similar mood.
| Kal Ho Naa Ho | Sing Street | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 7.4/10 | ★ 7.9/10 |
| Year | 2003 | 2016 |
| Length | 3h 7m | 1h 45m |
| Genres | Comedy, Drama, Romance | Comedy, Drama, Music, Romance |
| Country | India | – |
| Director | Nikkhil Advani | John Carney |
| Main cast | Saif Ali Khan, Shah Rukh Khan, Satish Shah, Sonali Bendre, Preity Zinta | Aidan Gillen, Mark McKenna, Lucy Boynton, Jack Reynor, Maria Doyle Kennedy |
Synopsis
Kal Ho Naa Ho
An uptight MBA student falls for the charismatic new neighbor who charms her troubled family – but he has a secret that forces him to push her away.
Sing Street
A boy growing up in Dublin during the 1980s escapes his strained family life by starting a band to impress the mysterious girl he likes.
Where to watch
Where to watch Kal Ho Naa HoWhere to watch Sing Street
More like Kal Ho Naa Ho · More like Sing Street · Compare other titles
Kal Ho Naa Ho
Sing Street