Kickboxer vs Man on Fire
Man on Fire has the higher audience score (7.5/10 against 6.8/10 for Kickboxer). Kickboxer is the shorter watch at 1h 37m compared with 2h 26m. Kickboxer is the older of the two (1989 against 2004). Both are action, drama, thriller movies, so they suit a similar mood.
Kickboxer
Man on Fire| Kickboxer | Man on Fire | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 6.8/10 | ★ 7.5/10 |
| Year | 1989 | 2004 |
| Length | 1h 37m | 2h 26m |
| Genres | Action, Drama, Thriller | Action, Drama, Thriller |
| Country | – | – |
| Director | David Worth, Mark DiSalle | Tony Scott |
| Main cast | Jean-Claude Van Damme, Ricky Liu, Michel Qissi, Michael Lee Ming-Yeung, Dennis Alexio | Dakota Fanning, Christopher Walken, Denzel Washington, Radha Mitchell, Mickey Rourke |
Synopsis
Kickboxer
If your enemy refuses to be humbled... Destroy him. Accompanied by his brother Kurt, American kickboxing champion Eric Sloane, arrives in Thailand to defeat the Eastern warriors at their own sport. His opponent: ruthless fighter and Thai champion, Tong Po. Tong not only defeats Eric, he paralyzes him for life. Crazed with anger, Kurt vows revenge.
Man on Fire
Jaded ex-CIA operative John Creasy reluctantly accepts a job as the bodyguard for a 10-year-old girl in Mexico City. They clash at first, but eventually bond, and when she's kidnapped he's consumed by fury and will stop at nothing to save her life.
Where to watch
Where to watch KickboxerWhere to watch Man on Fire
More like Kickboxer · More like Man on Fire · Compare other titles