King Arthur vs Master and Commander: The Far Side of the World
Master and Commander: The Far Side of the World has the higher audience score (7.2/10 against 6.3/10 for King Arthur). King Arthur is the shorter watch at 2h 6m compared with 2h 18m. Master and Commander: The Far Side of the World is the older of the two (2003 against 2004). Both are adventure, drama, war movies, so they suit a similar mood.
King Arthur
Master and Commander: The Far Side of the World| King Arthur | Master and Commander: The Far Side of the World | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 6.3/10 | ★ 7.2/10 |
| Year | 2004 | 2003 |
| Length | 2h 6m | 2h 18m |
| Genres | Action, Adventure, Drama, History, War | Adventure, Drama, War |
| Country | – | – |
| Director | Antoine Fuqua | Peter Weir |
| Main cast | Ray Stevenson, Joel Edgerton, Keira Knightley, Mads Mikkelsen, Hugh Dancy | Paul Bettany, David Threlfall, Russell Crowe, George Innes, Billy Boyd |
Synopsis
King Arthur
The story of the Arthurian legend, based on the 'Sarmatian hypothesis' which contends that the legend has a historical nucleus in the Sarmatian heavy cavalry troops stationed in Britain, and that the Roman-British military commander, Lucius Artorius Castus is the historical person behind the legend.
Master and Commander: The Far Side of the World
After an abrupt and violent encounter with a French warship inflicts severe damage upon his ship, a captain of the British Royal Navy begins a chase over two oceans to capture or destroy the enemy, though he must weigh his commitment to duty and ferocious pursuit of glory against the safety of his devoted crew, including the ship's thoughtful surgeon, his best friend.
Where to watch
Where to watch King ArthurWhere to watch Master and Commander: The Far Side of the World
More like King Arthur · More like Master and Commander: The Far Side of the World · Compare other titles