King Arthur vs Mongol: The Rise of Genghis Khan
Mongol: The Rise of Genghis Khan has the higher audience score (6.8/10 against 6.3/10 for King Arthur). Mongol: The Rise of Genghis Khan is the shorter watch at 2h 5m compared with 2h 6m. King Arthur is the older of the two (2004 against 2007). Both are action, adventure, history movies, so they suit a similar mood.
King Arthur
Mongol: The Rise of Genghis Khan| King Arthur | Mongol: The Rise of Genghis Khan | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 6.3/10 | ★ 6.8/10 |
| Year | 2004 | 2007 |
| Length | 2h 6m | 2h 5m |
| Genres | Action, Adventure, Drama, History, War | Action, Adventure, History, War |
| Country | – | – |
| Director | Antoine Fuqua | Sergei Bodrov |
| Main cast | Ray Stevenson, Joel Edgerton, Keira Knightley, Mads Mikkelsen, Hugh Dancy | Tadanobu Asano, Amadu Mamadakov, Sun Honglei, Baasanjav Mijid, Khulan Chuluun |
Synopsis
King Arthur
The story of the Arthurian legend, based on the 'Sarmatian hypothesis' which contends that the legend has a historical nucleus in the Sarmatian heavy cavalry troops stationed in Britain, and that the Roman-British military commander, Lucius Artorius Castus is the historical person behind the legend.
Mongol: The Rise of Genghis Khan
The story recounts the early life of Genghis Khan, a slave who went on to conquer half the world in the 11th century.
Where to watch
Where to watch King ArthurWhere to watch Mongol: The Rise of Genghis Khan
More like King Arthur · More like Mongol: The Rise of Genghis Khan · Compare other titles