King Arthur vs Ned Kelly
King Arthur has the higher audience score (6.3/10 against 6.1/10 for Ned Kelly). Ned Kelly is the shorter watch at 1h 50m compared with 2h 6m. Ned Kelly is the older of the two (2003 against 2004). Both are action, adventure, drama movies, so they suit a similar mood. Both feature Joel Edgerton.
King Arthur
Ned Kelly| King Arthur | Ned Kelly | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 6.3/10 | ★ 6.1/10 |
| Year | 2004 | 2003 |
| Length | 2h 6m | 1h 50m |
| Genres | Action, Adventure, Drama, History, War | Action, Adventure, Drama, History |
| Country | – | Australia |
| Director | Antoine Fuqua | Gregor Jordan |
| Main cast | Ray Stevenson, Joel Edgerton, Keira Knightley, Mads Mikkelsen, Hugh Dancy | Kerry Condon, Joel Edgerton, Emily Browning, Orlando Bloom, Heath Ledger |
Synopsis
King Arthur
The story of the Arthurian legend, based on the 'Sarmatian hypothesis' which contends that the legend has a historical nucleus in the Sarmatian heavy cavalry troops stationed in Britain, and that the Roman-British military commander, Lucius Artorius Castus is the historical person behind the legend.
Ned Kelly
After getting threatened by Kelly's friends and family, Constable Fitzpatrick places the blame on Ned Kelly and exaggerates what happened. With the biggest ever award available, Kelly and his gang set into the wild, to remain hidden from everyone who seeks them. Even if it means having his family arrested, the members of the Kelly Gang stay hidden and plan a way to get their names cleared.
Where to watch
Where to watch King ArthurWhere to watch Ned Kelly
More like King Arthur · More like Ned Kelly · Compare other titles