King Arthur vs Red Cliff
Red Cliff has the higher audience score (7.1/10 against 6.3/10 for King Arthur). King Arthur is the shorter watch at 2h 6m compared with 2h 25m. King Arthur is the older of the two (2004 against 2008). Both are action, adventure, drama movies, so they suit a similar mood.
King Arthur
Red Cliff| King Arthur | Red Cliff | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 6.3/10 | ★ 7.1/10 |
| Year | 2004 | 2008 |
| Length | 2h 6m | 2h 25m |
| Genres | Action, Adventure, Drama, History, War | Action, Adventure, Drama, History, War |
| Country | – | – |
| Director | Antoine Fuqua | John Woo |
| Main cast | Ray Stevenson, Joel Edgerton, Keira Knightley, Mads Mikkelsen, Hugh Dancy | Chang Chen, Tony Leung Chiu-wai, Shido Nakamura, Takeshi Kaneshiro, Zhao Wei |
Synopsis
King Arthur
The story of the Arthurian legend, based on the 'Sarmatian hypothesis' which contends that the legend has a historical nucleus in the Sarmatian heavy cavalry troops stationed in Britain, and that the Roman-British military commander, Lucius Artorius Castus is the historical person behind the legend.
Red Cliff
In 208 A.D., in the final days of the Han Dynasty, shrewd Prime Minster Cao convinced the fickle Emperor Han the only way to unite all of China was to declare war on the kingdoms of Xu in the west and East Wu in the south. Thus began a military campaign of unprecedented scale. Left with no other hope for survival, the kingdoms of Xu and East Wu formed an unlikely alliance.
Where to watch
Where to watch King ArthurWhere to watch Red Cliff
More like King Arthur · More like Red Cliff · Compare other titles