King Arthur vs Red Cliff II
Red Cliff II has the higher audience score (7.3/10 against 6.3/10 for King Arthur). King Arthur is the shorter watch at 2h 6m compared with 2h 21m. King Arthur is the older of the two (2004 against 2009). Both are action, adventure, drama movies, so they suit a similar mood.
King Arthur
Red Cliff II| King Arthur | Red Cliff II | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 6.3/10 | ★ 7.3/10 |
| Year | 2004 | 2009 |
| Length | 2h 6m | 2h 21m |
| Genres | Action, Adventure, Drama, History, War | Action, Adventure, Drama, History, War |
| Country | – | China |
| Director | Antoine Fuqua | John Woo |
| Main cast | Ray Stevenson, Joel Edgerton, Keira Knightley, Mads Mikkelsen, Hugh Dancy | Chang Chen, Tony Leung Chiu-wai, Shido Nakamura, Takeshi Kaneshiro, Zhao Wei |
Synopsis
King Arthur
The story of the Arthurian legend, based on the 'Sarmatian hypothesis' which contends that the legend has a historical nucleus in the Sarmatian heavy cavalry troops stationed in Britain, and that the Roman-British military commander, Lucius Artorius Castus is the historical person behind the legend.
Red Cliff II
The battle of Red Cliff continues and the alliance between Xu and East Wu is fracturing. With Cao Cao's massive forces on their doorstep, will the kingdoms of Xu and East Wu survive?
Where to watch
Where to watch King ArthurWhere to watch Red Cliff II
More like King Arthur · More like Red Cliff II · Compare other titles