King Arthur vs Red Tails
Red Tails has the higher audience score (6.6/10 against 6.3/10 for King Arthur). Red Tails is the shorter watch at 2h 5m compared with 2h 6m. King Arthur is the older of the two (2004 against 2012). Both are action, adventure, drama movies, so they suit a similar mood.
King Arthur
Red Tails| King Arthur | Red Tails | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 6.3/10 | ★ 6.6/10 |
| Year | 2004 | 2012 |
| Length | 2h 6m | 2h 5m |
| Genres | Action, Adventure, Drama, History, War | Action, Adventure, Drama, History, War |
| Country | – | – |
| Director | Antoine Fuqua | Anthony Hemingway |
| Main cast | Ray Stevenson, Joel Edgerton, Keira Knightley, Mads Mikkelsen, Hugh Dancy | Bryan Cranston, Daniela Ruah, Gerald McRaney, Method Man, Terrence Howard |
Synopsis
King Arthur
The story of the Arthurian legend, based on the 'Sarmatian hypothesis' which contends that the legend has a historical nucleus in the Sarmatian heavy cavalry troops stationed in Britain, and that the Roman-British military commander, Lucius Artorius Castus is the historical person behind the legend.
Red Tails
The story of the Tuskegee Airmen, the first African-American pilots to fly in a combat squadron during World War II.
Where to watch
Where to watch King ArthurWhere to watch Red Tails
More like King Arthur · More like Red Tails · Compare other titles