King Arthur vs Rise of the Conqueror
King Arthur and Rise of the Conqueror are tied on audience score (6.3/10). Rise of the Conqueror is the shorter watch at 1h 59m compared with 2h 6m. King Arthur is the older of the two (2004 against 2026). Both are action, adventure, history movies, so they suit a similar mood.
King Arthur
Rise of the Conqueror| King Arthur | Rise of the Conqueror | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 6.3/10 | ★ 6.3/10 |
| Year | 2004 | 2026 |
| Length | 2h 6m | 1h 59m |
| Genres | Action, Adventure, Drama, History, War | Action, Adventure, History, War |
| Country | – | – |
| Director | Antoine Fuqua | Jacob Schwarz |
| Main cast | Ray Stevenson, Joel Edgerton, Keira Knightley, Mads Mikkelsen, Hugh Dancy | Mahesh Jadu, Umit Ulgen, Sanzhar Madi, Sayed Badreya, Arazou Baker |
Synopsis
King Arthur
The story of the Arthurian legend, based on the 'Sarmatian hypothesis' which contends that the legend has a historical nucleus in the Sarmatian heavy cavalry troops stationed in Britain, and that the Roman-British military commander, Lucius Artorius Castus is the historical person behind the legend.
Rise of the Conqueror
In the 14th-century, as the Silk Road crumbles and rival factions tear the land apart, fearless warrior Timur emerges from exile. Stripped of everything, he fights to unite the fractured kingdoms, using strategy and sheer will to carve an empire from chaos. Undefeated in battle and widely regarded as one of history’s greatest military leaders and tacticians, not to mention one of its most brutal, Timur would found the Timurid Empire, which…
Where to watch
Where to watch King ArthurWhere to watch Rise of the Conqueror
More like King Arthur · More like Rise of the Conqueror · Compare other titles