King Arthur vs Rurouni Kenshin Part I: Origins
Rurouni Kenshin Part I: Origins has the higher audience score (7.5/10 against 6.3/10 for King Arthur). King Arthur is the shorter watch at 2h 6m compared with 2h 14m. King Arthur is the older of the two (2004 against 2012). Both are action, adventure, history movies, so they suit a similar mood.
King Arthur
Rurouni Kenshin Part I: Origins| King Arthur | Rurouni Kenshin Part I: Origins | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 6.3/10 | ★ 7.5/10 |
| Year | 2004 | 2012 |
| Length | 2h 6m | 2h 14m |
| Genres | Action, Adventure, Drama, History, War | Action, Adventure, Fantasy, History, War |
| Country | – | Japan |
| Director | Antoine Fuqua | Keishi Otomo |
| Main cast | Ray Stevenson, Joel Edgerton, Keira Knightley, Mads Mikkelsen, Hugh Dancy | Takeru Satoh, Yosuke Eguchi, Koji Kikkawa, Eiji Okuda, Go Ayano |
Synopsis
King Arthur
The story of the Arthurian legend, based on the 'Sarmatian hypothesis' which contends that the legend has a historical nucleus in the Sarmatian heavy cavalry troops stationed in Britain, and that the Roman-British military commander, Lucius Artorius Castus is the historical person behind the legend.
Rurouni Kenshin Part I: Origins
In 1868, after the Bakumatsu war ends, the ex-assassin Kenshin Himura traverses Japan with an inverted sword, to defend the needy without killing.
Where to watch
Where to watch King ArthurWhere to watch Rurouni Kenshin Part I: Origins
More like King Arthur · More like Rurouni Kenshin Part I: Origins · Compare other titles