King Arthur vs Saints and Soldiers
King Arthur and Saints and Soldiers are tied on audience score (6.3/10). Saints and Soldiers is the shorter watch at 1h 30m compared with 2h 6m. Saints and Soldiers is the older of the two (2003 against 2004). Both are action, adventure, drama movies, so they suit a similar mood.
King Arthur
Saints and Soldiers| King Arthur | Saints and Soldiers | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 6.3/10 | ★ 6.3/10 |
| Year | 2004 | 2003 |
| Length | 2h 6m | 1h 30m |
| Genres | Action, Adventure, Drama, History, War | Action, Adventure, Drama, History, War |
| Country | – | – |
| Director | Antoine Fuqua | Ryan Little |
| Main cast | Ray Stevenson, Joel Edgerton, Keira Knightley, Mads Mikkelsen, Hugh Dancy | Melinda Renee, Larry Bagby, Kirby Heyborne, Peter Holden, Alexander Polinsky |
Synopsis
King Arthur
The story of the Arthurian legend, based on the 'Sarmatian hypothesis' which contends that the legend has a historical nucleus in the Sarmatian heavy cavalry troops stationed in Britain, and that the Roman-British military commander, Lucius Artorius Castus is the historical person behind the legend.
Saints and Soldiers
Five American soldiers fighting in Europe during World War II struggle to return to Allied territory after being separated from U.S. forces during the historic Malmedy Massacre.
Where to watch
Where to watch King ArthurWhere to watch Saints and Soldiers
More like King Arthur · More like Saints and Soldiers · Compare other titles