King Arthur vs The Tiger
The Tiger has the higher audience score (7.7/10 against 6.3/10 for King Arthur). King Arthur is the shorter watch at 2h 6m compared with 2h 19m. King Arthur is the older of the two (2004 against 2015). Both are action, adventure, drama movies, so they suit a similar mood.
King Arthur
The Tiger| King Arthur | The Tiger | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 6.3/10 | ★ 7.7/10 |
| Year | 2004 | 2015 |
| Length | 2h 6m | 2h 19m |
| Genres | Action, Adventure, Drama, History, War | Action, Adventure, Drama, History |
| Country | – | – |
| Director | Antoine Fuqua | Park Hoon-jung |
| Main cast | Ray Stevenson, Joel Edgerton, Keira Knightley, Mads Mikkelsen, Hugh Dancy | Jeong Man-sik, Sung Yu-been, Choi Min-sik, Lee Na-ra, Jung Ji-so |
Synopsis
King Arthur
The story of the Arthurian legend, based on the 'Sarmatian hypothesis' which contends that the legend has a historical nucleus in the Sarmatian heavy cavalry troops stationed in Britain, and that the Roman-British military commander, Lucius Artorius Castus is the historical person behind the legend.
The Tiger
In 1925 Korea, Japanese rulers demand the last remaining tiger be killed. The tiger easily defeats his pursuers until a legendary hunter takes him on.
Where to watch
Where to watch King ArthurWhere to watch The Tiger
More like King Arthur · More like The Tiger · Compare other titles