King Arthur vs War Horse
War Horse has the higher audience score (7.3/10 against 6.3/10 for King Arthur). King Arthur is the shorter watch at 2h 6m compared with 2h 26m. King Arthur is the older of the two (2004 against 2011). Both are adventure, history, war movies, so they suit a similar mood.
| King Arthur | War Horse | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 6.3/10 | ★ 7.3/10 |
| Year | 2004 | 2011 |
| Length | 2h 6m | 2h 26m |
| Genres | Action, Adventure, Drama, History, War | Adventure, History, War |
| Country | – | – |
| Director | Antoine Fuqua | Steven Spielberg |
| Main cast | Ray Stevenson, Joel Edgerton, Keira Knightley, Mads Mikkelsen, Hugh Dancy | Peter Mullan, Robert Emms, Benedict Cumberbatch, Tom Hiddleston, Patrick Kennedy |
Synopsis
King Arthur
The story of the Arthurian legend, based on the 'Sarmatian hypothesis' which contends that the legend has a historical nucleus in the Sarmatian heavy cavalry troops stationed in Britain, and that the Roman-British military commander, Lucius Artorius Castus is the historical person behind the legend.
War Horse
On the brink of the First World War, Albert's beloved horse Joey is sold to the Cavalry by his father. Against the backdrop of the Great War, Joey begins an odyssey full of danger, joy, and sorrow, and he transforms everyone he meets along the way. Meanwhile, Albert, unable to forget his equine friend, searches the battlefields of France to find Joey and bring him home.
Where to watch
Where to watch King ArthurWhere to watch War Horse
More like King Arthur · More like War Horse · Compare other titles
King Arthur
War Horse