Kon-Tiki vs Red Cliff
Red Cliff has the higher audience score (7.1/10 against 6.9/10 for Kon-Tiki). Kon-Tiki is the shorter watch at 1h 58m compared with 2h 25m. Red Cliff is the older of the two (2008 against 2012). Both are adventure, history movies, so they suit a similar mood.
Kon-Tiki
Red Cliff| Kon-Tiki | Red Cliff | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 6.9/10 | ★ 7.1/10 |
| Year | 2012 | 2008 |
| Length | 1h 58m | 2h 25m |
| Genres | Adventure, History | Action, Adventure, Drama, History, War |
| Country | – | – |
| Director | Espen Sandberg, Joachim Rønning | John Woo |
| Main cast | Ian Bonar, Peter Wight, Jo Adrian Haavind, Pål Sverre Hagen, Tobias Santelmann | Chang Chen, Tony Leung Chiu-wai, Shido Nakamura, Takeshi Kaneshiro, Zhao Wei |
Synopsis
Kon-Tiki
The true story about legendary explorer Thor Heyerdahl and his epic crossing of the Pacific on a balsa wood raft in 1947, in an effort to prove it was possible for South Americans to settle in Polynesia in pre-Columbian times.
Red Cliff
In 208 A.D., in the final days of the Han Dynasty, shrewd Prime Minster Cao convinced the fickle Emperor Han the only way to unite all of China was to declare war on the kingdoms of Xu in the west and East Wu in the south. Thus began a military campaign of unprecedented scale. Left with no other hope for survival, the kingdoms of Xu and East Wu formed an unlikely alliance.
Where to watch
Where to watch Kon-TikiWhere to watch Red Cliff
More like Kon-Tiki · More like Red Cliff · Compare other titles