Kon-Tiki vs Rurouni Kenshin Part I: Origins
Rurouni Kenshin Part I: Origins has the higher audience score (7.5/10 against 6.9/10 for Kon-Tiki). Kon-Tiki is the shorter watch at 1h 58m compared with 2h 14m. Both are adventure, history movies, so they suit a similar mood.
Kon-Tiki
Rurouni Kenshin Part I: Origins| Kon-Tiki | Rurouni Kenshin Part I: Origins | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 6.9/10 | ★ 7.5/10 |
| Year | 2012 | 2012 |
| Length | 1h 58m | 2h 14m |
| Genres | Adventure, History | Action, Adventure, Fantasy, History, War |
| Country | – | Japan |
| Director | Espen Sandberg, Joachim Rønning | Keishi Otomo |
| Main cast | Ian Bonar, Peter Wight, Jo Adrian Haavind, Pål Sverre Hagen, Tobias Santelmann | Takeru Satoh, Yosuke Eguchi, Koji Kikkawa, Eiji Okuda, Go Ayano |
Synopsis
Kon-Tiki
The true story about legendary explorer Thor Heyerdahl and his epic crossing of the Pacific on a balsa wood raft in 1947, in an effort to prove it was possible for South Americans to settle in Polynesia in pre-Columbian times.
Rurouni Kenshin Part I: Origins
In 1868, after the Bakumatsu war ends, the ex-assassin Kenshin Himura traverses Japan with an inverted sword, to defend the needy without killing.
Where to watch
Where to watch Kon-TikiWhere to watch Rurouni Kenshin Part I: Origins
More like Kon-Tiki · More like Rurouni Kenshin Part I: Origins · Compare other titles