Kull the Conqueror vs The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring

The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring has the higher audience score (8.4/10 against 5.1/10 for Kull the Conqueror). Kull the Conqueror is the shorter watch at 1h 35m compared with 2h 59m. Kull the Conqueror is the older of the two (1997 against 2001). Both are action, adventure, fantasy movies, so they suit a similar mood.

Kull the Conqueror posterKull the Conqueror1997 VS The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring posterThe Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring2001
Kull the ConquerorThe Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring
Audience score★ 5.1/10★ 8.4/10
Year19972001
Length1h 35m2h 59m
GenresAction, Adventure, FantasyAction, Adventure, Fantasy
Country–New Zealand
DirectorJohn NicolellaPeter Jackson
Main castDouglas Henshall, Sven-Ole Thorsen, Harvey Fierstein, Kevin Sorbo, Tia CarrereLiv Tyler, Orlando Bloom, Cate Blanchett, John Rhys-Davies, Ian McKellen

Synopsis

Kull the Conqueror

A barbarian named Kull becomes ruler after defeating the old king in battle. In an effort to regain the throne, the former king's heirs resurrect Akivasha, a witch queen. However, Akivasha has plans of her own for the throne, and only Kull stands in the way.

The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring

Young hobbit Frodo Baggins, after inheriting a mysterious ring from his uncle Bilbo, must leave his home in order to keep it from falling into the hands of its evil creator. Along the way, a fellowship is formed to protect the ringbearer and make sure that the ring arrives at its final destination: Mt. Doom, the only place where it can be destroyed.

Where to watch

Where to watch Kull the ConquerorWhere to watch The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring

More like Kull the Conqueror · More like The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring · Compare other titles