L.A. Confidential vs Under Suspicion
L.A. Confidential has the higher audience score (7.8/10 against 6.1/10 for Under Suspicion). Under Suspicion is the shorter watch at 1h 50m compared with 2h 18m. L.A. Confidential is the older of the two (1997 against 2000). Both are crime, drama, thriller movies, so they suit a similar mood.
| L.A. Confidential | Under Suspicion | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 7.8/10 | ★ 6.1/10 |
| Year | 1997 | 2000 |
| Length | 2h 18m | 1h 50m |
| Genres | Crime, Drama, Mystery, Thriller | Crime, Drama, Thriller |
| Country | United States of America | – |
| Director | Curtis Hanson | Stephen Hopkins |
| Main cast | Ron Rifkin, Guy Pearce, Simon Baker, Danny DeVito, Russell Crowe | Monica Bellucci, Gene Hackman, Morgan Freeman, Thomas Jane, Nydia Caro |
Synopsis
L.A. Confidential
Three detectives in the corrupt and brutal L.A. police force of the 1950s use differing methods to uncover a conspiracy behind the shotgun slayings of the patrons at an all-night diner.
Under Suspicion
A lawyer is asked to come to the police station to clear up a few loose ends in his witness report of a foul murder. "This will only take ten minutes", they say, but it turns out to be one loose end after another, and the ten minutes he is away from his speech become longer and longer.
Where to watch
Where to watch L.A. ConfidentialWhere to watch Under Suspicion
More like L.A. Confidential · More like Under Suspicion · Compare other titles
L.A. Confidential
Under Suspicion